# Visual review — t0_p336d70065d

## Profile

Read `[local path omitted] Hole 1 is inside rectangular raised region 3; holes 2 and 3 lie in the broad curved base. Circular region 0 is between them and the rectangle, while capsule region 2 occupies the right end. The planned candidate isolates every closed feature locally and uses three broad transverse levels, with no narrow strip carried across the whole part.

## candidate1

Read `[local path omitted] Every feature was represented, but central rectangle correspondences crossed and the lower-left fan wrapped around the curved outline. Several long diagonal fans and thin central wedges were structural, not numerical. I revised the partition rather than submit it.

## candidate2

Read `[local path omitted] The central through hole and both filled regions were coherent, but the left circular features and right capsule still sent broad wedges to distant corners. Those weak transitions matched the base-region check failures, so I replaced the global fans with local cells.

## candidate3

Read `[local path omitted] Feature isolation improved: the capsule received a near-scale box, the central hole remained symmetric, and left features had shorter transitions. The drawing still showed pinched strips at the circular region's top and bottom, acute central side strips, and a poor six-corner transition between the capsule box and the adjacent strip. These were structural failures rather than isolated numerical defects. I did not submit a known-failing revision.

No candidate passed the free check. Remaining tradeoff: local boxes improved enclosure scale but their transitions into the curved global outline required a different complete quadrangulation than could be completed honestly in this session.